Epstein and Axtell, in Growing Artificial Societies, get all hyperbolic about the impact agent-based modelling has on 'Explanation'.
For many, explanation and prediction are the same thing, and one can see why: to ask any more of explanation is impossible. Explain gravity! Well, here are some lovely predictive rules. Yeah, but what is it, really? Well... here are some lovely rules? Explanation also seems intuitively at home with reductionism: why are there so many different types of atom? Coz they're formed from smaller exchangeable parts - look, here's how it works.
But Epstein and Axtell reckon they have a new form of explanation in agent-based models: it's 'generative explanation'. Epstein has a whole book on this one idea, but it also appears in their much earlier stuff just mentioned:
What constitutes an explanation of an observed social phenomenon? Perhaps one day people will interpret the question, 'can you explain it?' as asking 'can you grow it?' (Epstein & Axtell 1996 p.20)
Recent comments
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 7 weeks ago
1 year 7 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 10 weeks ago
1 year 13 weeks ago