lack of good appearance = perpetual handicap

...

Today’s modern society puts a premium on youth and good looks. In fact to look better, to look younger, to look more attractive has become the basic need for most of us because people who look good are made to feel good.

[The Lasertone Beauty Therapy Treatment leaftet, 1982, quoted by Mike Featherstone in the Consumer Reader.]

The self-confidence which a good appearance fosters is a most important contribution towards success. It is to a very great extent the measure of other people’s confidence in you. If you lack a good appearance you are suffering a perpetual handicap. To keep up a good appearance you need: to dress well; to get plenty of nourishing food; to have money and leisure for congenial recreation; to live in healthy surroundings. How can you do this if your wages and working hours do not permit it?

[Organising leaflet addressed to women by the National Amalgamated Union of Shop Assistants, Warehousemen, Etc., entitled Why it means so much to her!, (for your husband to stop letting down the side and get in the union) from around 1925.]

Who wins the guilt and shame arm-twisting competition out of these two? And can the NAUSAW (Etc.) lay claim to pioneering the art of making people feel shabby in order to get them to fit in? Hah… probably not, eh? I’d probably need at least two quotes to make an historical theory…

The Labour movement and consumerism

That 1925 quote is fascinating - a very early example of a phenomenon generally associated with post-war prosperity. Jeremy Seabrook is the most persistent critic of the unholy alliance between the Labour movement and consumerism in the third quarter of the 20th century. He returned to the subject just this week on Comment is Free - while, if you haven't come across it before, his 'Consuming Cultures' (published by the New Internationalist) is a more thorough rehearsal of his arguments, with a lot of comparisons between development in the rich world and the poor world. Unfortunately he seems to get pigeon-holed as either a "Back in the USSR"-style Communist or a prophet of doom, neither of which are fair. I think he's one of the most interesting voices of the independent Left in this country.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.